World leaders are figuring out how to manage Trump – but winning tactic may backfire

7 hours ago 2

By Michael D. Shear

July 9, 2025 — 3.30pm

The flattery was as obvious as it was effective. Seated at a dinner table in the Blue Room of the White House on Monday (Washington time), Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu of Israel handed President Donald Trump a piece of paper.

“I want to present to you, Mr president, the letter I sent to the Nobel Prize committee,” Netanyahu said, news cameras rolling to capture the moment. “It’s nominating you for the Peace Prize. It’s well deserved, and you should get it.”

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu passes to US President Donald Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize.

Trump declared the gesture from the prime minister “very meaningful,” though he has long said he believes the Nobel committee would never give him the prize.

The effort to curry favour was the latest evidence that many of the world’s leaders have figured Trump out. Heaping praise on the American president is the best way to manage him – even if it’s not entirely clear that the schmoozing leads to concrete benefits for their countries.

After once calling Trump a “bully”, Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney last month gushed over “your personal leadership of the United States”. NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte sent a private text to Trump hailing “your decisive action in Iran, that was truly extraordinary”. Trump made it public the next day.

And even President Volodymyr Zelensky of Ukraine, who endured an angry Oval Office shouting match in February, has worked to repair his frayed relationship with the American leader. A meeting of the pair at the Vatican in April went much more smoothly, with no blow-ups, according to both sides.

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky talks with US President Donald Trump in St Peter’s Basilica before Pope Francis’s funeral on April 26.

On Monday, Trump agreed to resume shipments of some weapons to Ukraine that had been paused just a week ago. The reversal came amid the improved relations with Zelensky and after a phone call with Putin that Trump called disappointing.

Sam Edwards, an associate professor of modern political history at Loughborough University in Britain, said Trump has reshaped global diplomacy.

“We’ve often thought of diplomacy as this big, broad endeavour. It’s about institutions connecting with one another,” he said. “In this instance, they’re playing the man.

“This is how it works,” he added. “You come with gifts; you offer homage of sorts, in order to gain the respect, the support, the favour of the head of that court.”

President Donald Trump, followed by Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney, French President Emmanuel Macron and Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, leave the podium after their group photo at the G7 Summit in Canada last month.

And yet, political analysts, diplomats and others who follow international interactions say that “playing the man” with public declarations of admiration does not always work, especially with a leader like Trump, whose decision-making is often fickle.

Netanyahu declared on Monday that Trump is “forging peace as we speak, in one country, in one region after the other”.

But stroking the president’s ego has not produced an end to the war in the Gaza Strip, which rages on even amid a resumption of ceasefire talks. In Europe, the war in Ukraine continues with no sign of the peace that Trump once promised would take him only 24 hours to implement. Some tariffs remain in place on British exports to America even after British Prime Minister Keir Starmer sealed a deal with Trump in part by delivering a royal invitation.

Yolanda Spies, a former South African diplomat and the director of the Oxford University Diplomatic Studies Program, said that flattery has long been built into the art of diplomacy.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer hands an invitation from King Charles to US President Donald Trump.

But she said that the most personal interactions between leaders used to happen privately, not in front of cameras.

“One of the driving thoughts of the profession of diplomacy is do all the hard work behind the scenes, where no one is watching,” she said. “Now, you have to be really careful, because anything you send to him will be public. It means a new step in the flattery game.”

Zelensky may appreciate the need for flattery more than most other world leaders, Spies said. After the humiliation of his Oval Office meeting this year, she said, Zelensky has dramatically changed the way he interacts with Trump.

“He has avoided those kinds of scenarios where he ends up having an argument with Donald Trump,” she said. “He now prefaces every statement with how grateful he is to America. There, a lesson was learned.”

In Netanyahu’s case, the appeal to Trump’s desire to be awarded a Nobel Peace Prize was not unique. Pakistan’s government formally nominated Trump in June, citing the president’s “decisive diplomatic intervention” during an outbreak of violence between India and Pakistan.

Trump has repeatedly complained, in public and in private, that he has not yet won the Peace Prize. He once posted on social media that “I won’t get a Nobel Peace Prize no matter what I do.”

And it’s not clear that a nomination from Netanyahu – who has been accused of war crimes and crimes against humanity in the Gaza Strip by the International Criminal Court – will help Trump’s case.

Medea Benjamin, founder of Code Pink, an anti-war group, posted her thoughts on social media.

“I don’t know whether to laugh or cry,” she wrote. “Surreal.”

This article originally appeared in The New York Times.