Man found not guilty of deliberately setting woman on fire

1 week ago 5
By Tara Cosoleto

September 30, 2025 — 1.37pm

A man accused of deliberately setting a neighbour on fire after arguing over loud noise has been found not guilty of attempted murder.

Michael Gauci, 46, nodded and looked up at the ceiling as the Victorian Supreme Court jury handed down its verdict on Tuesday.

Michael Gauci at the Melbourne Supreme Court on Wednesday.

Michael Gauci at the Melbourne Supreme Court on Wednesday.Credit: AAP

Gauci admitted he poured a bucket of liquid on Shari Grey and fired a gunshot during the December 2022 dispute in Melbourne’s outer south-west but denied setting her alight.

He faced trial after pleading not guilty to charges of attempted murder and intentionally causing injury in circumstances of gross violence.

Gauci also denied two separate charges of reckless conduct endangering serious injury to Grey’s friends during the incident.

Crown prosecutor Angela Moran alleged Gauci poured a bucket of flammable liquid over Grey early on December 28 after his wife confronted the group over loud noise they were making.

Michael Gauci was accused of pouring flammable liquid over his neighbour and igniting a blowtorch.

Michael Gauci was accused of pouring flammable liquid over his neighbour and igniting a blowtorch. Credit: Chris Hopkins

Gauci then ignited a blowtorch and set Grey’s entire head and upper body on fire, the prosecutor alleged.

As Grey’s friends used their bodies to put out the flames, it’s alleged Gauci returned inside with his wife before leaving the scene.

Grey suffered burns to 80 per cent of her body, as well as sepsis, acute kidney injury, deep vein thrombosis and post-traumatic stress disorder.

Loading

Her friends Steve Pirangi and Stacey Morgan also suffered burns as they tried to put out the flames.

Moran said Gauci was enraged by Grey’s earlier interaction with his wife and he deliberately set her on fire.

“We say that his actions that night were carefully planned and that he knew exactly what he was doing,” she told the jury.

But defence barrister, Dermot Dann, KC, argued the prosecution’s case was weak and his client held no intention to kill.

“It’s a case which attempts to paint a false picture of Gauci as this homicidal enraged man intent on murder,” he told the jury.

Gauci’s father outside court in 2022.

Gauci’s father outside court in 2022.Credit: Luis Enrique Ascui

Grey had physically attacked Gauci’s wife and Gauci threw a bucket of liquid over the women to break up the fight, Dann said.

Grey then came at Gauci and scratched at his face so he fired a shot from his rifle, the barrister told the jury.

Gauci never used a blowtorch and it might have been the muzzle flash from the firearm that caused the ignition, Dann argued.

The jurors began deliberating on September 23 and delivered their not guilty verdicts to all charges on Tuesday afternoon.

Gauci’s family broke into sobs and hugged each other after the jury’s decision was handed down.

He will walk free from the Supreme Court later on Tuesday but will return on Friday to plead guilty to a single charge of possessing an unregistered firearm.

AAP

Most Viewed in National

Loading

Read Entire Article
Koran | News | Luar negri | Bisnis Finansial