Sticking with the controversial BoM website redesign, parliamentarians across the political spectrum have slammed its eye-watering $96 million price tag.
Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek told Seven this morning: “I don’t think the new website has been a good exercise for the Bureau of Meteorology. When we came to government, there was a rebranding exercise going on where the BoM was asking people to call it the Bureau instead of the BoM.
“I said at the time, we needed to focus on weather, not rebranding... The security systems on the computers of the Bureau of Meteorology were very prone to hacking. The previous government was told that this project started around 2019, so some upgrades were necessary, but an unpopular website that doesn’t tell people the weather, well, that’s not really what we need.”
Minister for Social Services Tanya Plibersek.Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce. Credit: Alex Ellinghausen
Appearing alongside Plibersek was Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce, who came down hard on the redesign for its failure of farmers who heavily rely on the website.
“They told us 4.1 [million]. It’s more than 20 times that. More than 20 times… which was outrageous in any case, because the website worked, and now we spent $96 million to put a B at the end of the bomb site. It’s now bomb it’s, it’s hopeless.
“It infuriated so many farmers… because we really liked the old site, [it] was one of the most visited sites, or the most visited site, I think. Now we’ve got this fiasco, and we find out it’s cost us $96 million to stuff something up completely,” Joyce said.
The reactions follow news over the weekend that the unpopular new website cost millions of dollars more than previously reported, with the agency’s new chief revealing the cost of the heavily criticised redesign was $96 million.





















